Chuck Leavell Op/Ed
for WSJ, June 10, 2013
In the past two
weeks, news reports have covered European Union rules mandating that 20% of
energy in EU countries by 2020 must come from “renewable” sources. To meet the
requirement, European utilities are increasingly turning toward burning wood
instead of coal—with much of the wood coming from the United States in the form
of pellets.
Some
environmentalists complain that cutting down trees is hardly a “green”
solution, and utility-company officials have defended the practice of using
woody biomass as a renewable energy source. Yet one point of view hasn’t been
much in evidence in the debate. That is the view of independent forest owners
like me—my family manages 2,500 acres of forest in Georgia—who can speak
directly to practices of the forestry industry and the benefits it provides to
local communities.
First, some
perspective on the U.S.’s wealth of natural resources: The American South has
more than 214 million acres of forest land, according to the Southern Group of
State Foresters. About 89% of that land is privately owned, making it the
nation’s stronghold for private forest ownership and stewardship.
Although the U.S. has
a large amount of forested land, that does not mean the country can afford to
cut down trees in a careless, slash-and-burn fashion as in decades past—and
that is certainly not what is happening today.
Europe’s increasing use of woody biomass, such as
wood pellets, has not resulted in the inappropriate over-harvesting of U.S.
forests that some fear will happen. In fact, the demand has created a viable
use for woody material from forestry operations that usually goes to waste: the
twigs, limbs and other parts of trees that are otherwise unusable—and woody
material from thinning operations in which un-merchantable trees are removed to
allow other trees to grow stronger and healthier. In both cases, if this
material is not used for biomass, it is often
piled up to rot or be burned. Using this resource for energy puts it to good
use and is a wise thing to do.
There
is a common-sense approach to sustainably managing the nation’s forests.
Americans have learned the lesson that they need to be good stewards of the
land. Forest owners throughout the Southeast can be very proud of their forest
management practices. Sustainable methods and best practices have been
established, which include replanting trees and ensuring that the harvesting of
trees is done so in way that protects wildlife as well as air and water
quality.
The
forestry industry and thus the forest owners are governed by federal and state
laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act,
Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act and Healthy Forests Initiative. There are also
independent certifications that govern all forestry industries. The type of
certification a landowner chooses is up to that owner, but the standards are in
place. Individual forest owners also work hand-in-hand with state forestry
officials and with experienced licensed foresters for proper forestry
management.
Just as musicians are
passionate about their craft, independent
forest owners are passionate about their craft—the
art of land management. Our mantra is to leave the land in better shape than
when we found it. Not only do we care from aesthetic and recreational
perspectives, but for many, it’s good business to care.
After all, forest owners
who sell timber have an incentive to ensure that their forest remains healthy,
productive and sustainable—anything else would hurt the bottom line and
threaten their investment. Sound practices also create and protect jobs. In
Georgia alone, there are 24 million acres of forested land. According to
state-government estimates, this translates to roughly 188,000 jobs and $25
billion related to forestry. In the states that produce woody biomass, what was
once a declining job market has new hope as the forestry sector puts people
back to work in jobs connected to a resource that is natural, organic and
renewable.
I am also concerned
about what I call “The Invisible Forest Health Crisis”—the loss of natural
lands to growth and development. Landowners sometimes have tough choices to
make: sell the land so it can become some community’s latest strip mall or
other development—or keep the land as a sustainably managed working forest.
More demand for forest products increases the likelihood of those forests
remaining intact.
As a land and forest
owner I recognize that I can’t stop growth. But as a lifelong nature lover and
environmentalist, I can guide it. Preserving our forests and fostering the use
of wood products, including woody biomass—while also helping Europe meet its
admirable goals for renewable-energy sources—is not a bad proposition.
Mr. Leavell is the
keyboardist for the Rolling Stones and co-founder of the environmental website,
the Mother Nature Network (www.mnn.com). His most recent book is “Growing a
Better America: Smart, Strong and Sustainable” (Evergreen Arts, 2011).
Nice article at least your addressing future problems time will tell if your in the correct direction ,there's a lot to discuss and think about.
ReplyDeleteCell Walls ?
Right on Chuck and Rose Lane; this perspective desperately needs to be seen and heard. I am here to help, however I can. God Bless you guys.
ReplyDelete